<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WSJ: Net Neutrality Rules a Threat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freedomtalks.org/2006/04/18/wsj-net-neutrality-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2006/04/18/wsj-net-neutrality-rules/</link>
	<description>The FreedomWorks blog dedicated to lower taxes and more freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cannon</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2006/04/18/wsj-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/?p=201#comment-94</guid>
		<description>You're right, Cannon.  The last thing we need is Congress regulating the internet to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Cannon.  The last thing we need is Congress regulating the internet to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2006/04/18/wsj-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/?p=201#comment-91</guid>
		<description>The WSJ hit the nail on the head with this editorial.  The debate should not be one about how many new regulations can be created, but rather, one that looks at how to remove existing regulations that are protecting Internet providersÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ and telecom companiesÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ monopolies.  It is time the monopolies be regulated by fair competition standards used everywhere else in the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WSJ hit the nail on the head with this editorial.  The debate should not be one about how many new regulations can be created, but rather, one that looks at how to remove existing regulations that are protecting Internet providersÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ and telecom companiesÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ monopolies.  It is time the monopolies be regulated by fair competition standards used everywhere else in the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeftCoastLoner</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2006/04/18/wsj-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>LeftCoastLoner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/?p=201#comment-90</guid>
		<description>The WSJ has it right.  Net Neutrality warrants only one Comment:  "Keep government out of the business of regulating the internet. "</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WSJ has it right.  Net Neutrality warrants only one Comment:  &#8220;Keep government out of the business of regulating the internet. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cannon</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2006/04/18/wsj-net-neutrality-rules/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/?p=201#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I agree with the sentiment that government regulation will do more harm than good.  Consumers are already protected by the market and by current FCC regulations.  To invite Congress in to legislate only opens Pandoras Box, imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the sentiment that government regulation will do more harm than good.  Consumers are already protected by the market and by current FCC regulations.  To invite Congress in to legislate only opens Pandoras Box, imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
