A Brief Explanation of the Kelo Decision

August 7th, 2006 by Paul Burks

From an article in Parade magazine on eminent domain battles comes a brief explanation of what the furor is all about.

“It’s a blatant example of reverse Robin Hood—taking homes from the poor and the middle-income and giving them to the rich,” says Scott Bullock, the IJ attorney who argued (and lost) Kelo.

Want more? Sign up our free weekly newsletter:

   
We do not sell or share your email and you can unsubscribe at any time.

One Response to “A Brief Explanation of the Kelo Decision”

  1. Josef K Says:

    Thanks for the post & link!

Leave a Reply