Romney’s Altered Health Plan
August 24th, 2007 by Peter DeeryPresidential candidate Mitt Romney, who is known for his single payer universal health program in Massachusetts, has drastically altered his position by outlining a plan that relies on tax breaks and free market solutions rather than government mandates:
Mr. Romney plans to focus on tax breaks and streamlining regulations, policies his advisers say would essentially create a new, freer market for health insurance, driving down costs and providing incentives for individuals to buy their own plans. It is an approach President Bush and many Republican economists have embraced.
In today’s speech, Mr. Romney will nod to his 2006 success in the Northeastern Democratic stronghold, aides say. But he will also aim to reassure conservatives by saying that a “one size fits all” solution isn’t right for the 50 states. As for why he would use a different philosophy as president than as governor, they say he would have greater powers in the White House. “Massachusetts didn’t have the federal tax code to play with,” said Glenn Hubbard, a former Bush administration chief economist, now advising the Romney campaign.
Romney’s plan looks to restructure the tax code with incentives for individuals to buy private plans and will allow states more leeway in deciding on their own plans by reducing the federal government’s role and funding of health care. More on Romney’s change in philosophy
September 1st, 2007 at 9:41 pm
Romney’s mandatory insurance scheme is not a conservative idea.
Its yet another unfunded mandate that places everyone at the mercy of insurance companies who will exploit the captive market; and they will not lower their premiums under any circumstances. they have already proven that when they did not lower their premiums after tort reform ostensibly lowered their exposure to liability.
You are totally naive if you think Romney the flip flopper has changed his spots.
This mandatory health insurance policy that he and Ted Kennedy, a fellow massachusetts liberal, conspired together to force people to buy is antithetical to “free” markets.
a mandatory/compulsory market is antithetical to freedom and is not “free “at all.
“Freedomworks” my foot!
September 2nd, 2007 at 4:21 am
Is this all you got against Romney?
At least he’s not a womanizer like Guliani and Thompson, nor is he a sponser of any legislation comparable to McCain-Feingold. It seems to me that social conservatives are embracing the candidates that are fartherst from their beliefs. Yes, Romney is Mormon. So what? Everyone knows that Mormons are the modern-day Jews in regards to running everything. He’ll do just fine running against Hillary….
December 4th, 2007 at 11:45 am
jhfksdyfvegbkufysetfkusghvefku
December 4th, 2007 at 11:45 am
WOOOHOOOO!!! 3 more days till my birthday!!!! :]