Hillary tied to more campaign finance troubles

September 27th, 2007 by Brendan Steinhauser

The Washington Times reports today that Hillary Clinton’s campaign has picked up a few key players from the George Soros-funded America Coming Together, which the FEC just fined for misusing $70 million dollars in the 2004 election.

At least four persons who worked for the America Coming Together (ACT) fundraising group, which the Federal Election Commission recently fined $775,000, work directly for the Clinton campaign or hold top positions with consulting firms hired by it.

In addition, the group’s former president, longtime Clinton aide Harold Ickes, has been identified as a volunteer adviser to the Clinton campaign. In FEC filings, the campaign listed a debt to Mr. Ickes of more than $2,000 for travel-related costs.

For Clinton, this is just business as usual. It will be interesting to see how far this story goes before the Clintonistas threaten a lawsuit against the Washington Times or try to bully them into pulling the story. My question for campaign finance proponents and the media is, “Where is the outrage over the illegal behavior of America Coming Together and Hillary’s fundraising team?”

Want more? Sign up our free weekly newsletter:

   
We do not sell or share your email and you can unsubscribe at any time.

4 Responses to “Hillary tied to more campaign finance troubles”

  1. Mike Babka Says:

    MSM has always treated the Hill-Bill team “business as usual”. No news here. We will never know the actual damage done in this lifetime. This couple is way too slick.

  2. Lisa Richards Says:

    NUTS TOSSED OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST

    BY LISA RICHARDS
    October 1, 2007

    Yes, I’m talking about the Clintons again. As if it weren’t enough that we had to hear about Bill exposing “his” in the Oval Office for eight long years, now we have Hillary trying to shove her big tush back in the doors of the White House while attempting to rob every American tax-payer of more money for lazy parents.

    According to Madame Romanov, she would like every child born on U.S. soil to receive a check for $5,000 dollars, which will be put into an account collecting interest—off tax-payers of course—until the child reaches age 18. Those children Americans will have to forcibly hand money over to could include children of illegal aliens. Hillary did not state children of illegals would be included in her proposal, but anyone with a brain knows illegally born children will be bought for votes if Clinton’s proposal can make it to Washington.

    How lovely. It’s not enough the free-loading thieves of America crash our borders stealing our jobs and paychecks every April 15th, after crossing our lines while dropping babies on our soil in the process of invasion, the Mexican takeover might get paid for illegally birthing brats.

    If that sounds too harsh for readers, too bad; Hillary Clinton is trying to pick America’s pockets for lazy welfare Hispanic/black/illegal votes.

    This is also Hillary’s socialist attempt to return America to Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society when women who refused to work for a living were paid by hijacked taxpayers to have babies for a living. Welfare mother’s made a lot of money popping out babies for cash. Hillary wants them to have a chance to do so again.

    What a nice career for young women: opt out of high school and college; make money getting pregnant; whore yourself for Hillary votes. Don’t all you gals out there dream of aspiring to yearly profitable taxpayer pregnancies? Gosh, women of suffrage would be so proud.

    Oh, here’s the best part: it’s estimated this nutty sham could cost Americans $20 billion in taxes. We already pay $50 billion annually in welfare taxes to illegals alone. That would up the welfare lottery to $70 billion more annually, and that doesn’t include all welfare recipients.

    After readers have calmed down, read the next paragraph.
    According to Hillary, she “like[s] the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that would grow over time, so when that young person turns 18, if they have finished high school, they would be able to access it to go to college.”
    This is welfare every way you look at it and slice it. These kids are not going to go to college if this attempt at a LBJ bill gets passed. The kids will cash the money and use it as down payments on black sports cars with dark tinted windows and 4X5 foot speakers in the trunks blaring voodoo drumbeats to loud, pounding bass rhythms.
    P.S., this is also European Socialism. Europe is a welfare haven and many E.U. states are broke as a result of post WWII welfare for life. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher thought the E.U. was crazy to keep welfare for life for anyone in Britain. Then again, I’m speaking of the great Iron Lady who had more class than Miss Manners. Hillary is no lady; a Hun in pantsuits, but no lady.
    I wonder if Maggie Thatcher would like to run against Hillary.
    Hillary claims her plan will enable future 18 year-olds to put down-payments on homes with the $8,512 dollars in interest accumulated over 18 years.
    Where does anyone in America put eight grand down on a home; Mo and Curly’s trailer Park in the hills of Eastern Kentucky? 18 years from now, eight grand will be worth two cents Hillary. But taxpayers will have the privilege of saying they spent $20 billion yearly to purchase homes for the children of the lazy.
    Hillary also claims her plan will help these paid-for-by-the-taxpayers children pay for college tuition. Yeah, right. Hillary Clinton, do you have any idea what college tuition costs per semester in the U.S.? Do you understand most colleges now cost $150,000 dollars for a Bachelor’s degree? Do you realize the five to six books per class cost $50 to $150 dollars per book? Did taxpayers pay for Chelsea’s degree? Do you give a flying flip that eight grand in 18 years probably won’t buy one semester’s worth of books?
    Again; this is Hillary’s way of reinstituting LBJ’s Great Society back into America and what author Marvin Olasky stated in The Tragedy of American Compassion as something considered degradation by all races before 1960: “Until the 1960’s,” Olasky said, “the public dole was humiliation. Soon young men would be told that shining shoes was demeaning, and that accepting government subsidy meant a person could at least keep his dignity.”

    So it starts again. Convincing a certain group of Americans they never have to work for a living when there are taxpayers to pay the way.

    In FDR’s New Legacy is the Life of the Lie, author Jacob G. Hornberger stated: the “New deal [enacted by FDR] ‘rejected’ America’s foundations of the values of freedom and equality making many live what might be called ‘the life of the lie’ or the life that denies reality.” If people would wake up, they would realize Hillary Clinton is trying to deny blacks and Hispanics a normal life in order to become president.

    And for the record, it was Madame Romanov’s husband Bill who was forced to sign the August 22, 1996 bill titled Personal Responsibility And Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act—PRWORA—into law, dismantling the deteriorating welfare system. According to the Administration For Children & Families, Clinton’s PRWORA demanded twenty-five percent of all welfare recipients in each state enter the workforce after two years assistance. Single parents had to work twenty hours a week for the first year of welfare assistance, thirty hours the second year, becoming full-fledged members of the work-force.

    Now presidential hopeful Hillary wants Americans to pay for the birthing of other people’s children. While you’re at it Madame Romanov, why not just give the kids the title papers to every American taxpayers home—minus the mortgage payments of course—we wouldn’t want welfare recipients to feel they owe anyone a living.

    According to Professor Thomas Sowell, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institute: “there is a fundamental difference between seeking the truth and scoring points. In politics, the truth is strictly optional and that also seems to be true in parts of the media” In Sowell’s article “Myths of the Rich,” he speaks of how the media and politicians convince minorities that they are poor and always will be. Therein lays the brainwashing-into-welfare.

    Hillary and all liberals need poor people. Liberals will be out of jobs if Americans—especially black and Hispanics on welfare—wake up and realize liberals do not want them rich, educated and holding their heads up high. Liberals need ghettoed poor blacks and Hispanics voting democrat; liberals need uneducated blacks and Hispanics to never rise up out of poverty liberals like Hillary keep them in for the race-card vote.

    Now Hillary wants as many American—and don’t doubt illegal children will be included—born into welfare as possible. It’s the only way she can grab the low-income black and Hispanic vote and take over America.

    Hey, Britney, maybe if you promise Hillary a vote, she’ll buy your kids off K-Fed.

    copyright 2007 Lisa Richards
    http://www.lisa-richards.com
    E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

  3. penny eppler Says:

    I learned this when I lived in New York.

    An attitude:

    “you don’t like it? Sue me”.

    Also, “throw it all on the wall, and see what sticks”.

    In other words, “get away with what you can because - try taking it back - and it’s worth it because you got what you wanted”.

    These are typical Lawyer stalling and stealing power tactics - she and her husband are masters at this - so are most high powered lawyers anyway - middle America is still too easily “taken” by these kind of folks. Read the old book, “Winning by Intimidation”. That will turn your head around 360 degrees.

    Formerly naive in California.

  4. Bonnie Says:

    They are have normal compass, neither of the Clintons. They will bully and use vicious tactics to achieve their ends.

Leave a Reply