<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taxes and the Rich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/</link>
	<description>The FreedomWorks blog dedicated to lower taxes and more freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75973</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75973</guid>
		<description>"That implies that you believe they don’t."

Of course they don't...just ask them and/or their accountants.  There are rich people right now that are paying less in taxes to the federal govt. than their own low-level employees!

"What is the point of this particular website?"

It's to shill for the corporate, big money interests of the Right-wing of the GOP.

"As for consumption taxes being regressive, that implies the poor would pay more, or at least a larger percentage, than the wealthy."

Have you run the numbers for different income catagories?  I have, and the rich get off scott-free, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That implies that you believe they don’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course they don&#8217;t&#8230;just ask them and/or their accountants.  There are rich people right now that are paying less in taxes to the federal govt. than their own low-level employees!</p>
<p>&#8220;What is the point of this particular website?&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s to shill for the corporate, big money interests of the Right-wing of the GOP.</p>
<p>&#8220;As for consumption taxes being regressive, that implies the poor would pay more, or at least a larger percentage, than the wealthy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Have you run the numbers for different income catagories?  I have, and the rich get off scott-free, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75937</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75937</guid>
		<description>Period? That's it?
Taxes are a necessary evil but we do have some control over how they are structured and how they are implemented. The wealthy certainly need to pay their fair share. It just seems to me that the definition of "their fair share" is being written and re-written. Often by politicians who believe in class warfare. Your last sentence says it all, "...but the rich can well afford to pay their fair share of taxes." That implies that you believe they don't. Unfortunately no one here (including myself) seems able to produce verifiable statistics that demonstrate where the government pulls its tax revenue broken down into income categories. What percentage of total tax revenue comes from income tax? What percentage from corporate taxes? Other taxes? etc
It has been my experience that the wealthy pay considerable taxes. It seems to me that they pay the majority of total tax revenue that the government collects. I would be very interested to see actual verifiable IRS and OMB statistics that aren't skewed for either political parties interests. What is the point of this particular website? Isn't it that case the wealthy are paying well over 50% of total taxes? Are you arguing that this STILL isn't "fair?"

As for MISTER GUY's arguments that undocumented workers pay payroll taxes, I feel that a large percentage of those work for cash and pay no payroll taxes. That being said, there are pretty substantial numbers of legal Americans who work for cash so the Fair Tax would address both of those groups completely fairly and objectively. 

As for consumption taxes being regressive, that implies the poor would pay more, or at least a larger percentage, than the wealthy. Have you read the Fair Tax book? It seems pretty laid out in simple black and white that this simply isn't the case. If you have 100 years of evidence to the contrary, point me in that direction for enlightenment because I don't see it.

My point is not to be confrontational here. I do have significant disagreements with the current tax system. I do NOT know the perfect solution. I am quite open to alternatives. For now, the Fair Tax is HANDS DOWN, the best option I've seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Period? That&#8217;s it?<br />
Taxes are a necessary evil but we do have some control over how they are structured and how they are implemented. The wealthy certainly need to pay their fair share. It just seems to me that the definition of &#8220;their fair share&#8221; is being written and re-written. Often by politicians who believe in class warfare. Your last sentence says it all, &#8220;&#8230;but the rich can well afford to pay their fair share of taxes.&#8221; That implies that you believe they don&#8217;t. Unfortunately no one here (including myself) seems able to produce verifiable statistics that demonstrate where the government pulls its tax revenue broken down into income categories. What percentage of total tax revenue comes from income tax? What percentage from corporate taxes? Other taxes? etc<br />
It has been my experience that the wealthy pay considerable taxes. It seems to me that they pay the majority of total tax revenue that the government collects. I would be very interested to see actual verifiable IRS and OMB statistics that aren&#8217;t skewed for either political parties interests. What is the point of this particular website? Isn&#8217;t it that case the wealthy are paying well over 50% of total taxes? Are you arguing that this STILL isn&#8217;t &#8220;fair?&#8221;</p>
<p>As for MISTER GUY&#8217;s arguments that undocumented workers pay payroll taxes, I feel that a large percentage of those work for cash and pay no payroll taxes. That being said, there are pretty substantial numbers of legal Americans who work for cash so the Fair Tax would address both of those groups completely fairly and objectively. </p>
<p>As for consumption taxes being regressive, that implies the poor would pay more, or at least a larger percentage, than the wealthy. Have you read the Fair Tax book? It seems pretty laid out in simple black and white that this simply isn&#8217;t the case. If you have 100 years of evidence to the contrary, point me in that direction for enlightenment because I don&#8217;t see it.</p>
<p>My point is not to be confrontational here. I do have significant disagreements with the current tax system. I do NOT know the perfect solution. I am quite open to alternatives. For now, the Fair Tax is HANDS DOWN, the best option I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75591</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75591</guid>
		<description>"'basing taxes on one’s ability to pay' is exactly what we have with the existing progressive system."

Try again...the rest of your argument has been had and lost like a hundred years ago now.  Consumption taxes are regressive taxes, period.

"It would also force travelers, tourists, and illegals or 'undocumented' people to pay taxes on each purchase."

This already happens now...they pay sales taxes and/or payroll taxes.

"I don’t want to pay a ridiculous amount of taxes!"

Join the club, but the rich can well afford to pay their fair share of taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8216;basing taxes on one’s ability to pay&#8217; is exactly what we have with the existing progressive system.&#8221;</p>
<p>Try again&#8230;the rest of your argument has been had and lost like a hundred years ago now.  Consumption taxes are regressive taxes, period.</p>
<p>&#8220;It would also force travelers, tourists, and illegals or &#8216;undocumented&#8217; people to pay taxes on each purchase.&#8221;</p>
<p>This already happens now&#8230;they pay sales taxes and/or payroll taxes.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don’t want to pay a ridiculous amount of taxes!&#8221;</p>
<p>Join the club, but the rich can well afford to pay their fair share of taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75578</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75578</guid>
		<description>"basing taxes on one's ability to pay" is exactly what we have with the existing progressive system. It is simply amplified when tax credits are given to a large portion of the population including many who earn no income whatsoever. I notice that no one here points to the government's ability to generate federal tax revenues in the first 140 or so years of our country's existence. ANY income tax at all is unfair. ANY tax system that charges a higher rate based entirely upon success is unfair.
I am no expert on the fair tax but it does seem to me that a tax system, regardless of what you call it, that charges no tax at all for food and other necessities, or gives a rebate for these items, and then charges tax on other consumption, will automatically favor the poor who simply have less to spend therefore pay less tax. This system would also eliminate corporate loopholes because corporation would pay taxes regardless of where they base their offshore headquarters. It would also force travelers, tourists, and illegals or "undocumented" people to pay taxes on each purchase. 

The class warfare deal is a serious problem. The truth here is that no one argues whether or not the top percentages of wealthy Americans pay their share of taxes. They do. I notice that Sickle and some of the others are quick to point out a lack of "links" or other support for charts and numbers but they offer no figures or support for their own. THERE IS NO WEBSITE that doesn't have its own agenda. Period. We are being divided in order to be conquered. I work for a small family company that employs less than a dozen people. The taxes they pay are astronomical! They cannot expand due to tax constraints. They cannot hire more workers or purchase more equipment due to taxes. They pay more than $20,000 per month in payroll taxes and half that again to accountants and bookkeepers. The current system is broken but the powers that be pit people against each other based on their bank account and sit back and continue to operate a broken system.

I am not in the top income brackets but I would like to be some day. And when I get there, I don't want to pay a ridiculous amount of taxes! Class warfare is a horrible tactic but apparently quite effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;basing taxes on one&#8217;s ability to pay&#8221; is exactly what we have with the existing progressive system. It is simply amplified when tax credits are given to a large portion of the population including many who earn no income whatsoever. I notice that no one here points to the government&#8217;s ability to generate federal tax revenues in the first 140 or so years of our country&#8217;s existence. ANY income tax at all is unfair. ANY tax system that charges a higher rate based entirely upon success is unfair.<br />
I am no expert on the fair tax but it does seem to me that a tax system, regardless of what you call it, that charges no tax at all for food and other necessities, or gives a rebate for these items, and then charges tax on other consumption, will automatically favor the poor who simply have less to spend therefore pay less tax. This system would also eliminate corporate loopholes because corporation would pay taxes regardless of where they base their offshore headquarters. It would also force travelers, tourists, and illegals or &#8220;undocumented&#8221; people to pay taxes on each purchase. </p>
<p>The class warfare deal is a serious problem. The truth here is that no one argues whether or not the top percentages of wealthy Americans pay their share of taxes. They do. I notice that Sickle and some of the others are quick to point out a lack of &#8220;links&#8221; or other support for charts and numbers but they offer no figures or support for their own. THERE IS NO WEBSITE that doesn&#8217;t have its own agenda. Period. We are being divided in order to be conquered. I work for a small family company that employs less than a dozen people. The taxes they pay are astronomical! They cannot expand due to tax constraints. They cannot hire more workers or purchase more equipment due to taxes. They pay more than $20,000 per month in payroll taxes and half that again to accountants and bookkeepers. The current system is broken but the powers that be pit people against each other based on their bank account and sit back and continue to operate a broken system.</p>
<p>I am not in the top income brackets but I would like to be some day. And when I get there, I don&#8217;t want to pay a ridiculous amount of taxes! Class warfare is a horrible tactic but apparently quite effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psu77</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75496</link>
		<dc:creator>psu77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75496</guid>
		<description>Nice to see people talking about a progressive tax system.

A thing that has always bothered me about these discussions is the percentage of taxes paid by high income people, as in the NTU chart above.

First, why do these charts never have Gross Income instead of Adjusted Gross Income? I don't know many $30,000 a year workers maxing out their IRAs, do you?  Or maxing out their HSA's?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see people talking about a progressive tax system.</p>
<p>A thing that has always bothered me about these discussions is the percentage of taxes paid by high income people, as in the NTU chart above.</p>
<p>First, why do these charts never have Gross Income instead of Adjusted Gross Income? I don&#8217;t know many $30,000 a year workers maxing out their IRAs, do you?  Or maxing out their HSA&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sickle</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75368</link>
		<dc:creator>Sickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75368</guid>
		<description>I'd also like to point out that not a single contrarian commenter here has argued that "the rich doesn't pay its fair share."  For some reason, guys like Rich and Peter seem to think that's what we're saying, when we're not.  We're actually arguing about the policy, not the talking points surrounding that policy.  

I say this only because it's a little unsettling to see us responded to as straw men, instead of as normal people making very real policy points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also like to point out that not a single contrarian commenter here has argued that &#8220;the rich doesn&#8217;t pay its fair share.&#8221;  For some reason, guys like Rich and Peter seem to think that&#8217;s what we&#8217;re saying, when we&#8217;re not.  We&#8217;re actually arguing about the policy, not the talking points surrounding that policy.  </p>
<p>I say this only because it&#8217;s a little unsettling to see us responded to as straw men, instead of as normal people making very real policy points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75344</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75344</guid>
		<description>"As the federal budget mostly consists of entitlements which benefit the 'poor' much more than the 'rich'"

This is a load of bunk, and it's a shame that you don't know it.  Ever hear of corporate welfare, tax give-aways to Big Oil and the like, etc., etc.?

"how about a flat or fair tax?"

Do the math on it...it's a great deal for the rich and a crappy deal for the poor, period.  They even have a calculator for their tax scheme on this website...check it out and run some numbers.

"And what is the moral grounds for punishing success anyway?"

Sounds like you don't believe either in basing taxes on one's ability to pay...that's fine...some of us just disagree is all.

I meant 1984...the book by Orwell.  Sounds like you were raised right to me Leo.   :)

"in the US economy, small companies (like mine) employ more than 90% of the workers in the US, and without hard data, we are the ones that are actually moving this economy as oppose to mega corporations, or speculative hedge funds."

I agree completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As the federal budget mostly consists of entitlements which benefit the &#8216;poor&#8217; much more than the &#8216;rich&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a load of bunk, and it&#8217;s a shame that you don&#8217;t know it.  Ever hear of corporate welfare, tax give-aways to Big Oil and the like, etc., etc.?</p>
<p>&#8220;how about a flat or fair tax?&#8221;</p>
<p>Do the math on it&#8230;it&#8217;s a great deal for the rich and a crappy deal for the poor, period.  They even have a calculator for their tax scheme on this website&#8230;check it out and run some numbers.</p>
<p>&#8220;And what is the moral grounds for punishing success anyway?&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like you don&#8217;t believe either in basing taxes on one&#8217;s ability to pay&#8230;that&#8217;s fine&#8230;some of us just disagree is all.</p>
<p>I meant 1984&#8230;the book by Orwell.  Sounds like you were raised right to me Leo.   <img src='http://www.freedomtalks.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;in the US economy, small companies (like mine) employ more than 90% of the workers in the US, and without hard data, we are the ones that are actually moving this economy as oppose to mega corporations, or speculative hedge funds.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sickle</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75302</link>
		<dc:creator>Sickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75302</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I forgot to address an interesting point Rich is trying to make about the very rich (no pun intended seriously). It seems that be a meme, or some sort of cultural thing in the US to consider capital owners as a different breed of humans, which they are not.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Go to Brendan Steinhauser's MySpace page (just search for his name) and you'll see his favorite books are heavy on Ayn Rand.  I read "Atlas Shrugs" and "Fountainhead" in High School like everyone else and of course believed I was one of Rand's chosen, special people, just like everybody else who reads her.  Of course, I got older and realized how silly that all was (again, like most folks), but others like the folks here have bought all that stuff hook, line, and sinker.

In short, they really do believe that capital owners are a different breed of humans and that it is their (divine?) right to do whatever is good for them at the expense of other, lesser people.

What strikes me is how these guys have duped their "grassroots" into voting against their interest, using the very people they scapegoat and despise to pass their agenda.  I doubt their "activists" know that their contributions are going to paying Dick Armey's half-a-million dollar annual salary from Freedomworks (for well under 40-hours of work, check out their latest 990s).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I forgot to address an interesting point Rich is trying to make about the very rich (no pun intended seriously). It seems that be a meme, or some sort of cultural thing in the US to consider capital owners as a different breed of humans, which they are not.</p></blockquote>
<p>Go to Brendan Steinhauser&#8217;s MySpace page (just search for his name) and you&#8217;ll see his favorite books are heavy on Ayn Rand.  I read &#8220;Atlas Shrugs&#8221; and &#8220;Fountainhead&#8221; in High School like everyone else and of course believed I was one of Rand&#8217;s chosen, special people, just like everybody else who reads her.  Of course, I got older and realized how silly that all was (again, like most folks), but others like the folks here have bought all that stuff hook, line, and sinker.</p>
<p>In short, they really do believe that capital owners are a different breed of humans and that it is their (divine?) right to do whatever is good for them at the expense of other, lesser people.</p>
<p>What strikes me is how these guys have duped their &#8220;grassroots&#8221; into voting against their interest, using the very people they scapegoat and despise to pass their agenda.  I doubt their &#8220;activists&#8221; know that their contributions are going to paying Dick Armey&#8217;s half-a-million dollar annual salary from Freedomworks (for well under 40-hours of work, check out their latest 990s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75288</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75288</guid>
		<description>I forgot to address an interesting point Rich is trying to make about the very rich (no pun intended seriously). It seems that be a meme, or some sort of cultural thing in the US to consider capital owners as a different breed of humans, which they are not. There is no innate difference between a capital owner and a hard worker such an auto mechanic for instance.

In fact I would argue that professionals (like Doctors, Lawyers, Architecs, Engineers) contribute more to society as a whole than rich capital owners. However those professionals are the ones that are carrying the tax burden right now in comparison to other high income earners (like hedge fund managers).

My counterpoint to Rich's is that in the US economy, small companies (like mine) employ more than 90% of the workers in the US, and without hard data, we are the ones that are actually moving this economy as oppose to mega corporations, or speculative hedge funds.

The whole super rich thing is just a myth, the US economy is driven by 70% internal consuptiom (done by normal people, mostly middle class). And we, the small business owners, provide jobs for 90% of them.

Also it is a fallacy that goverments must reward risk takers, there is nothing worthy about taking risks, in fact any idiot can do it (just look at the subprime market mess). The rewards or punishments of risk taking should be left to market forces. The important thing is to tax income from any source the same way, be it manual labor, intelectual one, or just dividends or capital gains. All at the end is the same money, and should be taxed in a consistent manner.

My grief with the 10 million and up bracket is that they are having a field day with taxes because their capital gains are taxed at 15% flat. I fail to see any reason why, unless we buy into the whole "capital gains are for especial people and they deserve rewards" philosophy, which is clearly false.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to address an interesting point Rich is trying to make about the very rich (no pun intended seriously). It seems that be a meme, or some sort of cultural thing in the US to consider capital owners as a different breed of humans, which they are not. There is no innate difference between a capital owner and a hard worker such an auto mechanic for instance.</p>
<p>In fact I would argue that professionals (like Doctors, Lawyers, Architecs, Engineers) contribute more to society as a whole than rich capital owners. However those professionals are the ones that are carrying the tax burden right now in comparison to other high income earners (like hedge fund managers).</p>
<p>My counterpoint to Rich&#8217;s is that in the US economy, small companies (like mine) employ more than 90% of the workers in the US, and without hard data, we are the ones that are actually moving this economy as oppose to mega corporations, or speculative hedge funds.</p>
<p>The whole super rich thing is just a myth, the US economy is driven by 70% internal consuptiom (done by normal people, mostly middle class). And we, the small business owners, provide jobs for 90% of them.</p>
<p>Also it is a fallacy that goverments must reward risk takers, there is nothing worthy about taking risks, in fact any idiot can do it (just look at the subprime market mess). The rewards or punishments of risk taking should be left to market forces. The important thing is to tax income from any source the same way, be it manual labor, intelectual one, or just dividends or capital gains. All at the end is the same money, and should be taxed in a consistent manner.</p>
<p>My grief with the 10 million and up bracket is that they are having a field day with taxes because their capital gains are taxed at 15% flat. I fail to see any reason why, unless we buy into the whole &#8220;capital gains are for especial people and they deserve rewards&#8221; philosophy, which is clearly false.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75287</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/01/31/taxes-and-the-rich/#comment-75287</guid>
		<description>Here is the link to the IRS information:

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/07infallbulreturns.pdf


With regard to fairness and 1984 concepts, I might agree about how relative or outdate they can be. But beyond the philosophical issues, there is an objective one. Any change that benefits a small percentage of tax payers in detriment of a huge number of them is plainly wrong and misguided.

For whatever reason, be it hard work, or just being lucky at birth, some of us are in the upper middle class or higher brackets and even with our tax burden we have it way too easy compared with a vast majority of americans, let alone with the rest of the world. This discussion about lowering taxes, at least in my personal view, comes down to a matter of pure greed. I think that an effective tax rate around 25% is manageable for people like me. Of course I would take a nice tax cut anytime you want, but not at the expense of others that have a harder time than me, call me stupid or idealistic, but that is the way I was raised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the link to the IRS information:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/07infallbulreturns.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/07infallbulreturns.pdf</a></p>
<p>With regard to fairness and 1984 concepts, I might agree about how relative or outdate they can be. But beyond the philosophical issues, there is an objective one. Any change that benefits a small percentage of tax payers in detriment of a huge number of them is plainly wrong and misguided.</p>
<p>For whatever reason, be it hard work, or just being lucky at birth, some of us are in the upper middle class or higher brackets and even with our tax burden we have it way too easy compared with a vast majority of americans, let alone with the rest of the world. This discussion about lowering taxes, at least in my personal view, comes down to a matter of pure greed. I think that an effective tax rate around 25% is manageable for people like me. Of course I would take a nice tax cut anytime you want, but not at the expense of others that have a harder time than me, call me stupid or idealistic, but that is the way I was raised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
