<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Question, But Not &#8220;The&#8221; Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/10/a-question-but-not-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/10/a-question-but-not-the-question/</link>
	<description>The FreedomWorks blog dedicated to lower taxes and more freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/10/a-question-but-not-the-question/#comment-77787</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/10/a-question-but-not-the-question/#comment-77787</guid>
		<description>“What are the costs versus benefits of reducing emissions to avoid warming?”

Well, I'm no global warming fan at all, but assuming that the "warming" is a huge problem, why would the cost to fix it be the highest question on the list of priorities on what to do about?  I think you're just trying to get in the back door here by saying that it's going to cost too much to fix a "problem" that you don't think exists in the first place.  Whether global warming is real or not, it's not good public policy to allow pollution from CO, CO2, Methane, etc. to continue...you wouldn't want to breathe that stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“What are the costs versus benefits of reducing emissions to avoid warming?”</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m no global warming fan at all, but assuming that the &#8220;warming&#8221; is a huge problem, why would the cost to fix it be the highest question on the list of priorities on what to do about?  I think you&#8217;re just trying to get in the back door here by saying that it&#8217;s going to cost too much to fix a &#8220;problem&#8221; that you don&#8217;t think exists in the first place.  Whether global warming is real or not, it&#8217;s not good public policy to allow pollution from CO, CO2, Methane, etc. to continue&#8230;you wouldn&#8217;t want to breathe that stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
