<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For the Children! Still!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/</link>
	<description>The FreedomWorks blog dedicated to lower taxes and more freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sickle</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/#comment-79089</link>
		<dc:creator>Sickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/#comment-79089</guid>
		<description>Peter, what you wrote makes sense.  What that guy wrote didn't make any sense at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, what you wrote makes sense.  What that guy wrote didn&#8217;t make any sense at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/#comment-79083</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/#comment-79083</guid>
		<description>That's the thing though...alternative energy sources don't have to be "more expensive".  Imagine what position this country would have been in today if we continued to focus on conservation &#38; alternative energy sources like Jimmy Carter wanted us to over 30 years ago?

Still not seeing any easy way to get to the posts that are older than the ones displayed on the front page of this website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the thing though&#8230;alternative energy sources don&#8217;t have to be &#8220;more expensive&#8221;.  Imagine what position this country would have been in today if we continued to focus on conservation &amp; alternative energy sources like Jimmy Carter wanted us to over 30 years ago?</p>
<p>Still not seeing any easy way to get to the posts that are older than the ones displayed on the front page of this website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Suderman</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/#comment-79073</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Suderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/#comment-79073</guid>
		<description>It's really not that difficult to follow. 

Complaints about a process being more expensive are usually portrayed as whiny upper-middle class types who don't want to sacrifice their three-car garage. Bailey's point is that requiring more expensive methods from poor, third-world countries is not just a matter of luxury, but a matter of life or death.   When you're struggling to make a dollar a day, drastic economic changes like those that are likely to follow carbon-rationing have serious consequences. 

The follow-up is that wealthier, more technologically advanced societies are more capable of addressing environmental challenges. So why not wait till further down the road, when we're wealthier, more knowledgeable, have more resources, etc. rather than succumb to panic now and enact policies (like, say, Kyoto) that are both hugely expensive (thus having a ripple effect on future wealth) and completely ineffectual?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really not that difficult to follow. </p>
<p>Complaints about a process being more expensive are usually portrayed as whiny upper-middle class types who don&#8217;t want to sacrifice their three-car garage. Bailey&#8217;s point is that requiring more expensive methods from poor, third-world countries is not just a matter of luxury, but a matter of life or death.   When you&#8217;re struggling to make a dollar a day, drastic economic changes like those that are likely to follow carbon-rationing have serious consequences. </p>
<p>The follow-up is that wealthier, more technologically advanced societies are more capable of addressing environmental challenges. So why not wait till further down the road, when we&#8217;re wealthier, more knowledgeable, have more resources, etc. rather than succumb to panic now and enact policies (like, say, Kyoto) that are both hugely expensive (thus having a ripple effect on future wealth) and completely ineffectual?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/#comment-79038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/#comment-79038</guid>
		<description>I think ruining the environment because it's simply cheaper is silly and short-sighted.

What's up with the front page of this blog's website?  It looks like the posting below this post has screwed up the website or something...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think ruining the environment because it&#8217;s simply cheaper is silly and short-sighted.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s up with the front page of this blog&#8217;s website?  It looks like the posting below this post has screwed up the website or something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sickle</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/#comment-79004</link>
		<dc:creator>Sickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/03/25/for-the-children-still/#comment-79004</guid>
		<description>I honestly couldn't follow his point.  It didn't make any sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly couldn&#8217;t follow his point.  It didn&#8217;t make any sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
