<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senator Hutchison hiding earmark requests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/07/senator-hutchison-hiding-earmark-requests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/07/senator-hutchison-hiding-earmark-requests/</link>
	<description>The FreedomWorks blog dedicated to lower taxes and more freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Army Lifer</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/07/senator-hutchison-hiding-earmark-requests/#comment-85537</link>
		<dc:creator>Army Lifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/07/senator-hutchison-hiding-earmark-requests/#comment-85537</guid>
		<description>Why is it suddenly so fashionable and so conservative for member of Congress to take the position that every bureaucrat in Washington knows more about their state and their district than they do?  That is precisely what it means when a Congressman takes a "no earmark" pledge.  They are saying that budget decisions that affect their constituents should be made by bureaucrats because that is the practical effect of such a position.  In doing so they are abdicating their Constitutional responsiblity as  the branch of government that has the power of the purse.  Senator Hutchison knows she knows more about Texas needs than some GS-12 budget analyst or some unelected Deputy Assistant Secretary in charge of Presidential pork.  Texas taxpayers receive back less for their taxdollars in terms of highway funding than taxpayers in any other state.  Earmarks are one way to level that playing field. Texas voters should demand their representatives not take any more anti-constituent, pro-bureaucrat pledges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it suddenly so fashionable and so conservative for member of Congress to take the position that every bureaucrat in Washington knows more about their state and their district than they do?  That is precisely what it means when a Congressman takes a &#8220;no earmark&#8221; pledge.  They are saying that budget decisions that affect their constituents should be made by bureaucrats because that is the practical effect of such a position.  In doing so they are abdicating their Constitutional responsiblity as  the branch of government that has the power of the purse.  Senator Hutchison knows she knows more about Texas needs than some GS-12 budget analyst or some unelected Deputy Assistant Secretary in charge of Presidential pork.  Texas taxpayers receive back less for their taxdollars in terms of highway funding than taxpayers in any other state.  Earmarks are one way to level that playing field. Texas voters should demand their representatives not take any more anti-constituent, pro-bureaucrat pledges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Chief</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/07/senator-hutchison-hiding-earmark-requests/#comment-81305</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Chief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/07/senator-hutchison-hiding-earmark-requests/#comment-81305</guid>
		<description>If you are looking for more conservative representatives, look no farther than the Democrats.  Seems silly, but when I look over the records of the Senate and House of Representatives.  Under Democratic rule, spending was held back, under Republicans. it jumps.    *ACTIONS* speak louder than words.  

   Repubicans,  'talk the talk, but don't walk the walk'
   Democrats,   'walk the walk'  

Heck, I don't care what they want to call themselves. I want a smaller government!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are looking for more conservative representatives, look no farther than the Democrats.  Seems silly, but when I look over the records of the Senate and House of Representatives.  Under Democratic rule, spending was held back, under Republicans. it jumps.    *ACTIONS* speak louder than words.  </p>
<p>   Repubicans,  &#8216;talk the talk, but don&#8217;t walk the walk&#8217;<br />
   Democrats,   &#8216;walk the walk&#8217;  </p>
<p>Heck, I don&#8217;t care what they want to call themselves. I want a smaller government!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/07/senator-hutchison-hiding-earmark-requests/#comment-79735</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 06:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/07/senator-hutchison-hiding-earmark-requests/#comment-79735</guid>
		<description>She's a liberal?  Come now...a horrible disgrace of a Senator for sure, but being for continuing scientific reasearch using stem cells to fight disease does not make anyone a liberal...it makes them pro-science, period.  I hope she does run for Gov. of TX, then we can be rid of her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s a liberal?  Come now&#8230;a horrible disgrace of a Senator for sure, but being for continuing scientific reasearch using stem cells to fight disease does not make anyone a liberal&#8230;it makes them pro-science, period.  I hope she does run for Gov. of TX, then we can be rid of her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/07/senator-hutchison-hiding-earmark-requests/#comment-79726</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/07/senator-hutchison-hiding-earmark-requests/#comment-79726</guid>
		<description>I'm really disappointed in my Senator. If there was a more conservative candidate for U.S. Senate in 2006 I would have voted for that person over Senator Hutchison.

Truthfully, I think Senator Hutchison is a liberal with some conservative beliefs:
Some of her liberal beliefs:
1. Big spender,
2. Wants embryonic stem cell research.

Two VERY big issues for social (embryonic stem cell research) and economic (big spender) conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really disappointed in my Senator. If there was a more conservative candidate for U.S. Senate in 2006 I would have voted for that person over Senator Hutchison.</p>
<p>Truthfully, I think Senator Hutchison is a liberal with some conservative beliefs:<br />
Some of her liberal beliefs:<br />
1. Big spender,<br />
2. Wants embryonic stem cell research.</p>
<p>Two VERY big issues for social (embryonic stem cell research) and economic (big spender) conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
