<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neutrality Isn&#8217;t Neutral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/</link>
	<description>The FreedomWorks blog dedicated to lower taxes and more freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Van Theodorou</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/#comment-101013</link>
		<dc:creator>Van Theodorou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/#comment-101013</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear we agree, getting more government involvement will only lead to higher prices and less efficiency.  Lets not even get started on government healthcare :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear we agree, getting more government involvement will only lead to higher prices and less efficiency.  Lets not even get started on government healthcare <img src='http://www.freedomtalks.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/#comment-80379</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/#comment-80379</guid>
		<description>I want the telephone companies prosecuted for helping the Bush administration engage in illegal wiretapping on the American people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want the telephone companies prosecuted for helping the Bush administration engage in illegal wiretapping on the American people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Suderman</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/#comment-80278</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Suderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/#comment-80278</guid>
		<description>I'm not involved in the details of our fund raising efforts, so I really have no idea. I've only been with FW since mid 07, and I opposed neutrality regs on phones and the net before that.  (See here: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjQzNTViMWEwODY3MmY0ZjlkNGZkN2IyN2UyYjE5N2I=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not involved in the details of our fund raising efforts, so I really have no idea. I&#8217;ve only been with FW since mid 07, and I opposed neutrality regs on phones and the net before that.  (See here: <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjQzNTViMWEwODY3MmY0ZjlkNGZkN2IyN2UyYjE5N2I=" rel="nofollow">http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjQzNTViMWEwODY3MmY0ZjlkNGZkN2IyN2UyYjE5N2I=</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sickle</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/#comment-80219</link>
		<dc:creator>Sickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/#comment-80219</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I'm not buying this argument either.  For one, the idea that the government is "taking a side" is kind of a dishonest gloss.  The question is whether or not the Internet and its networks are public, private, or some combination of the two (much like existing phone networks).  Moreover, inasmuch as there is a public interest in this question, government has a responsibility to examine the issue.

At the forefront is the impact of tiered service on small businesses.  Internet-based commerce is a rather egalitarian field right now, where people who offer the best products and services get the most business, even if they're just a small business.  Since they have the same access speed as everyone else, they're able to compete handily with the big boys.  Tiered service will cripple small Internet businesses.  Like to play video games online?  Forget it, unless you pay for faster service, and then there's no guarantee the server you're connecting to can be any faster.

The telecoms will profit, though, and make more money, largely at the expense of small businesses, bloggers, small political groups like this one, etc. etc.  I could go on and on, but it's striking that none of this already occurred to you, Peter.  You know as well as anyone else that small businesses drive our economy.

But then, we already know that the major telecoms have sent you guys a bunch of checks.  Don't suppose you'd like to disclose how much money you've gotten from the telecoms in the past years, would you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m not buying this argument either.  For one, the idea that the government is &#8220;taking a side&#8221; is kind of a dishonest gloss.  The question is whether or not the Internet and its networks are public, private, or some combination of the two (much like existing phone networks).  Moreover, inasmuch as there is a public interest in this question, government has a responsibility to examine the issue.</p>
<p>At the forefront is the impact of tiered service on small businesses.  Internet-based commerce is a rather egalitarian field right now, where people who offer the best products and services get the most business, even if they&#8217;re just a small business.  Since they have the same access speed as everyone else, they&#8217;re able to compete handily with the big boys.  Tiered service will cripple small Internet businesses.  Like to play video games online?  Forget it, unless you pay for faster service, and then there&#8217;s no guarantee the server you&#8217;re connecting to can be any faster.</p>
<p>The telecoms will profit, though, and make more money, largely at the expense of small businesses, bloggers, small political groups like this one, etc. etc.  I could go on and on, but it&#8217;s striking that none of this already occurred to you, Peter.  You know as well as anyone else that small businesses drive our economy.</p>
<p>But then, we already know that the major telecoms have sent you guys a bunch of checks.  Don&#8217;t suppose you&#8217;d like to disclose how much money you&#8217;ve gotten from the telecoms in the past years, would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/#comment-80214</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/04/14/neutrality-isnt-neutral/#comment-80214</guid>
		<description>Are the frequencies that cell networks used regulated?  If so, I'm afraid you're out of luck getting Big Brother off your back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the frequencies that cell networks used regulated?  If so, I&#8217;m afraid you&#8217;re out of luck getting Big Brother off your back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
