The Ethanol Disaster
May 1st, 2008 by Peter SudermanHow bad are biofuels? I’ve had my say. The Washington Post gets down and dirty:
Across the country, ethanol plants are swallowing more and more of the nation’s corn crop. This year, about a quarter of U.S. corn will go to feeding ethanol plants instead of poultry or livestock. That has helped farmers like Johnson, but it has boosted demand — and prices — for corn at the same time global grain demand is growing.
And it has linked food and fuel prices just as oil is rising to new records, pulling up the price of anything that can be poured into a gasoline tank. “The price of grain is now directly tied to the price of oil,” says Lester Brown, president of Earth Policy Institute, a Washington research group. “We used to have a grain economy and a fuel economy. But now they’re beginning to fuse.”
…
Although ethanol was once promoted as a way to slow climate change, a study published in Science magazine Feb. 29 concluded that greenhouse-gas emissions from corn and even cellulosic ethanol “exceed or match those from fossil fuels and therefore produce no greenhouse benefits.”
And how did this mess begin?
In 2005, the Republican-led Congress and President Bush backed a bill that required widespread ethanol use in motor fuels. Just four months ago, the Democratic-led Congress passed and Bush signed energy legislation that boosted the mandate for minimum corn-based ethanol use to 15 billion gallons, about 10 percent of motor fuel, by 2015. It was one of the most popular parts of the bill, appealing to farm-state lawmakers and to those worried about energy security and eager to substitute a home-grown energy source for a portion of U.S. petroleum imports. To help things along, motor-fuel blenders receive a 51 cent subsidy for every gallon of corn-based ethanol used through the end of 2010; this year, production could reach 8 billion gallons.
Ethanol promotion has been a pander issue for both parties. And it’s not hard to see why. The politics have always seemed like a good idea; corn farmers, not surprisingly, are big, big fans of ethanol subsidies, and other folks weren’t concerned enough about it (plus heard that maybe it stopped global warming or something). Turns out, though, that making policy by listening to the people who stand to get a bigger share of taxpayer money is not always as effective as other approaches, like, you know… looking at the facts.
May 1st, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Glad to see the liberal media finally catch up on this critical issue…I wrote on it a year ago, Armey called for repeal in 2006, and in 2002 then-CSE President Paul Beckner argued against ethanol mandates.
May 3rd, 2008 at 7:08 am
The only way for anyone in the republican party, who is disiilusioned by the current administration and the coolaid drinkers in the house and senate, who passed this erroneous bills, endorsed by this idiot of a president, is to be become independent voters and start reading objectivist books by aynrand, i recommend all of them, then only will you come to know how bad this country is being screwed over and more freedom taken away by the same politicians on both sides of the aisle, watchout here comes the FARMBILL another government giveaway program with no end insight. capitalism is the cure, not goverment intervensionism.
May 5th, 2008 at 9:50 pm
Ethanol is only a small part of rising food prices, here are the main reasons:
- This years world wheat harvest has been one of the worst on record. A once in 100 year drought in Austrailia, plus bad weather in Canada and Ukraine have had a major impact.
- China is moving 30 million people a year off farms and into the cities and the Chinese are eating more meat which requires much more output to feed the animals.
- High energy prices mean the inputs to agriculture like fertilizer have skyrocketed.
Ethanol is now contributing 8% of all US gasoline, without it, gas would be even higher.
The oil companies have never liked ethanol and don’t want to build infrastructure to support it. When cellulosic ethanol ramps up, they will lose business. Having said that, the US needs to drill for MUCH more oil within the US and just offshore.