The Place for Pragmatism

May 21st, 2008 by Peter Suderman

I hit up the Reason magazine forum on libertarianism yesterday. (Mike Gravel was there! How could I resist?) As expected, it was pleasantly entertaining and somewhat silly – but didn’t offer much hope for more practical-minded limited-government advocates. Much of the discussion got sidetracked on ancillary issues (Is it better to work in a factory than an office? Whither the poker vote?), and domestic policy was reduced, more or less, to talk about which federal agencies should be the first to get the guillotine. That’s a lot of fun –- goodness knows the Department of Education is an under-performing bureaucratic behemoth, and getting rid of it used to be a conservative hobby-horse — but it hardly takes into account current political realities. I’m certainly in favor of pushing boundaries, but it’s unlikely to do much good unless it’s grounded in something at least somewhat resembling the current political playing field.

And what that means is that advocates of limited government need to remain focused on reforming the system as it stands, praising those legislators who do right, and pushing the rest toward better policy.

Want more? Sign up our free weekly newsletter:

   
We do not sell or share your email and you can unsubscribe at any time.

One Response to “The Place for Pragmatism”

  1. Mike Says:

    If you may indulge me in this relevant plug, there is a revitalized organization that has gained nearly 3,000 members in a relatively short period of time. We have chapters in a handful of states to include Ohio, Texas, Alaska and Florida. Hundreds of our members are deployed service members as well. Perhaps most interesting is that many of our members identify with the GOP while many others are Democrats. This is likely because we cater to those who find themselves cherry-picking between traditionally GOP isses and also traditionally Democrtatic issues. We are probably the largest third party that most people have not heard of. We plan on moving in coordinated phases. But our issues and membership goes with what your post was all about. Please take a look at our Web site at http://www.modernwhig.org. We would love to get feedback. Thank you.

Leave a Reply