Drilling Away the Pain at the Pump

June 2nd, 2008 by Peter Suderman

Here’s an interesting statistic: According to the latest Gallup poll, a majority of Americans support Congress allowing oil companies to drill in U.S. coastal and wilderness areas now off limits. With oil prices hovering around $4 a gallon in most parts of the country, this is hardly a surprise. Worldwide demand is on the rise, so the only way to make a long-term dent in the price of oil is to increase supply. The editors at NRO agree:

if members of Congress really want to mitigate the effects of high oil prices as much as they claim they do, they could start by letting oil companies bring America’s vast untapped supplies to market.

We’re not just talking about the Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve (ANWR) — which Congress stupidly keeps off-limits even though proposed oil exploration there would only affect approximately 2,000 of its 19 million acres — though opening just that 0.01 percent of ANWR to oil and natural gas development could supply 5 percent of America’s oil per year for 12 years before it starts to decline, according to Energy Department estimates. The Outer Continental Shelf — also off-limits to drilling — likely contains billions of barrels of additional oil and natural gas reserves.

Of course, none of this seems to have gotten through to some members of Congress, who insist on trying to pin gas prices on oil executives even as the public’s belief that oil companies are to blame has dropped sharply. The solution here is simple: more oil, lower prices.

Want more? Sign up our free weekly newsletter:

   
We do not sell or share your email and you can unsubscribe at any time.

2 Responses to “Drilling Away the Pain at the Pump”

  1. Mister Guy Says:

    “oil and natural gas development could supply 5 percent of America’s oil per year for 12 years before it starts to decline”

    Otherwise known as a about 1.5 years worth of oil that would take *decades* to pump out of the ground.

    The solution is not doing more of the same & expecting a different result.

    What about this from one of those articles?:
    “Majority of Americans Support Price Controls on Gas”

    or this:
    “Americans also support releasing supplies from the federal government’s strategic petroleum reserve”

    Some of these ideas are good, and others are not…to cherry pick at them is disingenuous IMO.

  2. Sickle Says:

    That’s all they can do is cherry-pick, Guy. They don’t believe in facts, they believe in Rand.

    Except for their ultra-Christian state directors, that is. They just believe in Satan.

Leave a Reply