<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Obama&#8217;s sweetheart loan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/07/02/barack-obamas-sweetheart-loan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/07/02/barack-obamas-sweetheart-loan/</link>
	<description>The FreedomWorks blog dedicated to lower taxes and more freedom.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dee Sisson</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/07/02/barack-obamas-sweetheart-loan/#comment-104203</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee Sisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/?p=1568#comment-104203</guid>
		<description>Gee! Could it be the Congressmen, women, Senators (you name it) who got the sweatheart deals want the buy out to pass, so they don't have to pay it back? Or was that the idea in the minds of the loanees when they gave the loans in the first place? How do we make them pay it back, so the $7B can at least be reduced? Call me naive, but I'm just learning and want some straight answers, not garblety gook. Or doesn't politics come without the garblety gook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee! Could it be the Congressmen, women, Senators (you name it) who got the sweatheart deals want the buy out to pass, so they don&#8217;t have to pay it back? Or was that the idea in the minds of the loanees when they gave the loans in the first place? How do we make them pay it back, so the $7B can at least be reduced? Call me naive, but I&#8217;m just learning and want some straight answers, not garblety gook. Or doesn&#8217;t politics come without the garblety gook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureAEI</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/07/02/barack-obamas-sweetheart-loan/#comment-92832</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureAEI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/?p=1568#comment-92832</guid>
		<description>Regarding your statement "This is the same controversial home Senator Obama bought with the help of a sweetheart land deal with convicted felon and political insider Tony Rezko." Rezko was NOT involved with the initial purchase of Senator Obama's home. Rezko owned the vacant lot next to Senator Obama's home. If he desired to add that lot to his property, it's not as if he has an option as to who to buy it from. Your insinuation as to Rezko's involvement seems to indicate that you have an agenda, and does not speak well of your true interest in the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your statement &#8220;This is the same controversial home Senator Obama bought with the help of a sweetheart land deal with convicted felon and political insider Tony Rezko.&#8221; Rezko was NOT involved with the initial purchase of Senator Obama&#8217;s home. Rezko owned the vacant lot next to Senator Obama&#8217;s home. If he desired to add that lot to his property, it&#8217;s not as if he has an option as to who to buy it from. Your insinuation as to Rezko&#8217;s involvement seems to indicate that you have an agenda, and does not speak well of your true interest in the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hinz</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/07/02/barack-obamas-sweetheart-loan/#comment-92610</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hinz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/?p=1568#comment-92610</guid>
		<description>I believe it was the Democrats in Congress, when investigating then President GHW Bush,  "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." 

Our politicians should be held to a higher standard....or at the very least, a comparable standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it was the Democrats in Congress, when investigating then President GHW Bush,  &#8220;The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it&#8217;s the seriousness of the charge that matters.&#8221; </p>
<p>Our politicians should be held to a higher standard&#8230;.or at the very least, a comparable standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Nagan</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomtalks.org/2008/07/02/barack-obamas-sweetheart-loan/#comment-92066</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Nagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomtalks.org/?p=1568#comment-92066</guid>
		<description>yes, let's get real, what is the big deal with someone that is qualified and gets a mortgage!  I got three at one time and was not qualified but I am a white middle class junkie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, let&#8217;s get real, what is the big deal with someone that is qualified and gets a mortgage!  I got three at one time and was not qualified but I am a white middle class junkie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
